SM
Cagliari vs. Juventus: 9 hrs 2 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league

:Headline: EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league: ID:382695: from db_amp
The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees.

Rick Parry fears Bury may not be the last EFL club to lose their membership over financial difficulties.

The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees to the EFL, with a late takeover bid also collapsing.

League Two club Macclesfield are in a perilous state, having been charged in November with misconduct by the EFL over failing to pay players' wages. The Silkmen also face further disciplinary action after the club failed to fulfil their fixture against Crewe last weekend.

Parry admits it is unlikely Bury will be an isolated case.

"I definitely can't say (Bury) will be the last, there may be more fall-out to come," he said.

"We have seen the problems with Macclesfield which are fairly extreme and they are not the only one. Maybe we are going to have to go through more pain before it gets better."

Parry did not feel the issue was that there were too many clubs in the EFL structure.

"I don't think we have got too many clubs, there are many full-time clubs thriving below the EFL," he said.

"There are a few bad owners and maybe there are still a few to weed out."

The problems faced by Bury will be addressed as part of an independent review of EFL governance by Jonathan Taylor QC, a barrister specialising in sports law.

Bury's league membership was withdrawn in August (Peter Byrne/PA)

One solution may be the introduction of clearer, tighter salary cap rules.

Parry admits the decision in rugby union to dock Saracens 35 points for salary cap breaches suggests such sanctions are legally enforceable and that it is an area which could be explored.

"The Saracens decision says it must be lawful because it is something they have enforced," he said.

"We always felt it was something that couldn't be explored. I've heard clubs recently say maybe what we have is too complex and maybe we should concentrate on the issue we are all concerned about which is wage costs and focus on something similar.

"But to say that's the majority view or something that is likely to happen is way off the mark. It's part of the debate.

"We do have quite different rules in Championship compared with salary cost management protocols lower down. That works, but some clubs think we should have more of an alignment and one set of rules."

amp_article__382695 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-12-13 00:25:39:
html db last update - 2021-03-05 14:16:16 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html

Click here for more stories about Rick Parry

Click here for more stories about Macclesfield Town

Share this article now:
Read more about Rick Parry Off The Pitch
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
CStockport CountyStockport442611791444789
4MK Dons442281474611374
5Crewe AlexandraCrewe441913126861770
6BarrowBarrow431814115849968
7Crawley TownCrawley44206186965466
8Walsall441811156665165
9Doncaster RoversDoncaster43197176363064
10Gillingham44189174353-1063
11AFC Wimbledon4416141457471062
12Harrogate TownHarrogate441711165562-762
13Bradford CityBradford431612155255-360
14Notts County44177208885358
15Morecambe44179186376-1357
16Newport CountyNewport44167216171-1055
17Tranmere RoversTranmere44166226364-154
18Accrington StanleyAccrington44159205766-954
19Swindon TownSwindon441411197478-453
20Salford City441211216380-1747
21Grimsby Town441016185572-1746
22Colchester UnitedColchester431111215774-1744
23Sutton UnitedSutton44913225378-2540
RForest Green RoversForest Green4499264177-3636
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .