M
SM

ITF accuses ATP of blocking 'necessary' changes

PA | 28d
The introduction of a two-tier ranking system has created a "bottleneck" in men's tennis, according to the ITF.

The International Tennis Federation has accused the ATP of blocking change that could alleviate the struggles of players at the lower levels of the game.

The ITF has borne the brunt of fierce criticism of major structural alterations to the sport that came into force at the beginning of the year.

The number of players deemed professional has been slashed, with ATP and WTA Tour ranking points no longer available for the smallest tournaments, which instead now award ITF points.

"I don't want to speak for them but my understanding is they want to wait and see how this plays out over the first two quarters of the year but we believe the issue is more immediate than that and it would make immediate sense to have those points back in.

"At the moment we're not addressing the player opportunity issue and creating essentially a bottleneck at the 25,000 level, which understandably is causing frustration for the players who are in that ranking band."

Press Association Sport has contacted the ATP for comment.

Players have been vocal in their disdain for the new system on social media while a petition started by Canadian player Maria Patrascu has attracted close to 15,000 signatures.

High-profile coaches like Toni Nadal, Patrick Mouratoglou and Magnus Norman have all voiced their concerns and the ITF insists it is listening.

Alterations have already been made, with a small increase in the size of qualifying draws announced last month and further changes detailed on Wednesday.

These include another increase in qualifying to boost the number of players able to compete each week as well as the regulation of pre-qualifying, which has been a major bone of contention.

Some tournaments were taking advantage of players desperate to get into their events by setting up pre-qualifying rounds that required entrants to stay in official hotels.

“I accept it is big change and it's difficult change, but it's absolutely necessary change.”
-

Discussions will be had, meanwhile, about expanding qualifying draws further to 48 players, meaning players would have to play two matches in one day.

But, regardless of the teething problems, Dent has no doubt the move has been the right one, saying: "This is one of the biggest reform programmes in tennis.

"Unfortunately the sport didn't act on the issues at the bottom of the game for many decades. Yes I accept it is big change and it's difficult change, but it's absolutely necessary change.

"We've always said that this isn't the end of what we're doing. What we're putting in place is a new system that needs to be adjusted as we go along to make it work. We're listening to the stakeholders and adapting where we can, and that process will be ongoing."

One major gripe from players has been that, while the ITF has cited the recommendations of the independent review into corruption in the sport for a number of the changes and the speed at which they have been introduced, the number one recommendation has not yet been implemented.

That was the discontinuation of data sales for 15,000 US dollars tournaments. The ITF signed a lucrative deal with Sportradar through to the end of 2021 but insists it will comply with the recommendation in due course.



amp_article_354013 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-03-20 18:05:36:
html db last update - 2019-03-24 06:26:15 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Select and display your favourite team's news and scores in this panel
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool34267177205785
2Manchester CityMan City33272486226483
3Tottenham HotspurSpurs332211064343067
4Arsenal33206766402666
5Chelsea34206857362166
6Manchester UnitedMan Utd33197763441964
7Leicester CityLeicester34145154645147
8Wolverhampton WanderersWolves33138124142-147
9Everton34137144644246
10Watford33137134748-146
11West Ham UnitedWest Ham34126164252-1042
12Bournemouth34125174961-1241
13Crystal Palace34116174046-639
14Burnley34116174260-1839
15Newcastle UnitedNewcastle34108163243-1138
16Southampton3399153954-1536
17Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton3396183253-2133
18Cardiff CityCardiff3494213063-3331
RFulham3455243276-4420
RHuddersfield TownHuddersfield3435261967-4814
Scroll for more - Tap for full version

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Transfer Talk Daily
Match previews - twice weekly
Morning Briefing (7am UTC)
UC
Get the latest transfer news, match previews and news direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Select and display your favourite team's news and scores in this panel
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool34267177205785
2Manchester CityMan City33272486226483
3Tottenham HotspurSpurs332211064343067
4Arsenal33206766402666
5Chelsea34206857362166
6Manchester UnitedMan Utd33197763441964
7Leicester CityLeicester34145154645147
8Wolverhampton WanderersWolves33138124142-147
9Everton34137144644246
10Watford33137134748-146
11West Ham UnitedWest Ham34126164252-1042
12Bournemouth34125174961-1241
13Crystal Palace34116174046-639
14Burnley34116174260-1839
15Newcastle UnitedNewcastle34108163243-1138
16Southampton3399153954-1536
17Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton3396183253-2133
18Cardiff CityCardiff3494213063-3331
RFulham3455243276-4420
RHuddersfield TownHuddersfield3435261967-4814
Scroll for more - Tap for full version
X

We value your privacy

A part of our GDPR compliance we need to ask for your consent. We and our partners use technology such as cookies on Sports Mole to personalise content and ads, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. Click below to consent to the use of this technology on Sports Mole.