SM
Man City vs. Feyenoord: 4 hrs 47 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

On this day in 2004: Great Britain win Olympic gold in men's 4x100m relay

:Headline: On this day in 2004: Great Britain win Olympic gold in men's 4x100m relay: ID:411938: from db_amp
Britain's men's athletes had been in danger of finishing without an Olympic medal of any colour for the first time.

Great Britain had not won an Olympic relay gold medal since 1912 ahead of Athens in 2004.

The United States had dominated the men's 4×100 metres relay in the intervening 92 years, winning 15 of the 19 Olympic titles available.

But the British quartet of Jason Gardener, Darren Campbell, Marlon Devonish and Mark Lewis-Francis made the a red-hot American squad settle for second best.

It was an incredible end to a dismal track and field meeting for Britain's male athletes.

Great Britain's Mark Lewis-Francis (second right) holds off the challenge of the United States' Maurice Greene (third left) to win Olympic gold for Great Britain in the men's 4×100 metres relay (David Davies/PA)

It looked as if they would finish without an Olympic medal of any colour for the first time in history.

The men's sprinters had also badly under-performed with no representation in either the 100m or 200m Olympic finals for the first time since 1976.

But that all changed after Britain had almost been disqualified from the semi-final following a poor third baton change.

The Americans seemed unbeatable with 100m champion Justin Gatlin, 200m champion Shawn Crawford and three-time world champion Maurice Greene in their line-up.

Unbridled joy from Mark Lewis-Francis at the finishing line (Phil Noble/PA)

Coby Miller, the fourth member of the quartet, had also dipped below 10 seconds in the US trials.

The omens did not seem good as the British four had been hampered by injury and loss of form and Gardener then had a false start in the final.

But Britain, in lane three, had the Americans in their sights two lanes outside them and Gardener and Campbell kept them in touch.

The Americans made a mess of their second baton changeover and Devonish gave Lewis-Francis a narrow lead into the final straight.

Lewis-Francis ran the leg of his life to hold off Greene and win by the thickness of a vest in 38.07 seconds.

Olympic 100 metres champion Justin Gatlin was in the beaten American team (Mike Egerton/PA)

The US were one hundredth of a second behind and Nigeria took the bronze.

The victory was especially sweet for Campbell, who had been criticised publicly by American track legend Michael Johnson about the actual seriousness of his injury.

"After what certain people have said about me I did contemplate going home," Campbell said.

"I had a meeting with the guys and said if they wanted me to keep going I would.

"Once they put their faith in me, I had full faith in them. The craziest thing is we knew we were going to win it."

amp_article__411938 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2020-08-28 07:20:56:
html db last update - 2020-08-28 07:20:56 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool1210112481631
2Manchester CityMan City127232217523
3Chelsea126422314922
4Arsenal126422112922
5Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton126422116522
6Tottenham HotspurSpurs1261527131419
7Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest125431513219
8Aston Villa125431919019
9Fulham125341717018
10Newcastle UnitedNewcastle125341313018
11Brentford125252222017
12Manchester UnitedMan Utd124441313016
13Bournemouth124351617-115
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham124351519-415
15Everton122551017-711
16Leicester CityLeicester122461523-810
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves122372028-89
18Ipswich TownIpswich121651323-109
19Crystal Palace121561017-78
20Southampton121110924-154
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .