SM
Ipswich vs. Man United: 6 hrs 50 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

England slump to 54-6 at Headingley

:Headline: England slump to 54-6 at Headingley: ID:368987: from db_amp
Australia were toppled for 179 on Thursday but look like removing England for fewer runs.

England turned in a dismal batting performance on the second morning of the third Ashes Test, slumping to 54 for six as they threatened to squander Jofra Archer's brilliance with the ball.

Archer claimed a superb six for 45 to topple Australia for a modest 179 on Thursday but, with the stage set for the batsmen to respond in style under blue skies at Headingley, their reply was calamitous.

The tourists bowled wonderfully well, consistently challenging the outside edge at a good pace and relying on the pitch for minor deviations, but England's top order was unforgivably limp under examination.

Australia's James Pattinson celebrates taking Joe Denly's wicket (Mike Egerton/PA)

Joe Denly was the only player to make double figures in the morning session but arguably suffered worst of all, repeatedly beaten before being put out of his misery on 12.

The all-too-familiar collapse began with Jason Roy's latest failure at the top of the order, briefly hinting at an alternative version of events with two clean boundaries before chasing Josh Hazlewood with a drive that flew straight to David Warner at first slip. He had just nine to his name, his exact average in six disappointing innings at opener.

The next blow was even more grievous, captain Joe Root handing Warner a second take tumbling sharply to his left after Hazlewood tempted the error with a fine delivery. Having made the first golden duck of his career at Lord's last week this was now the first time he had banked successive noughts.

Denly successfully overturned an lbw shout without scoring – the first of seven awkward moments he experienced before getting off the mark with a cover-driven four.

Marnus Labuschagne accounted for Ben Stokes (Tim Goode/PA)

Australia were delayed but not deterred, Pat Cummins hitting Rory Burns' forearm with a bouncer then cashing in as the opener took on the next one but gloved it behind.

Ben Stokes produced the worst shot yet, following a boundary through point by chasing a wide from James Pattinson. Down on one knee at the point of contact he stretched to make contact but picked out Warner yet again.

Somehow Denly was still there but he was being routinely beaten on the outside edge, almost chopped on twice and survived another lbw shout. His tortured stay eventually came to an end as a flourishing drive wobbled gently to the wicketkeeper.

Jonny Bairstow then lingered for 15 uncomfortable deliveries before becoming Hazlewood's third victim and Warner's fourth, edging off the back foot and brilliantly caught.

Jos Buttler and Chris Woakes were the not-out batsmen at lunch, with a huge rescue job ahead of them.

amp_article__368987 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-08-23 13:03:25:
html db last update - 2019-08-23 13:03:25 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool119112161528
2Manchester CityMan City127232217523
3Chelsea126422314922
4Arsenal126422112922
5Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton126422116522
6Tottenham HotspurSpurs1261527131419
7Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest125431513219
8Aston Villa125431919019
9Newcastle UnitedNewcastle115331311218
10Fulham125341717018
11Brentford125252222017
12Manchester UnitedMan Utd114341212015
13Bournemouth124351617-115
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham113351319-612
15Everton122551017-711
16Leicester CityLeicester122461523-810
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves122372028-89
18Crystal Palace121561017-78
19Ipswich TownIpswich111551222-108
20Southampton11119721-144
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .