SM
Spurs vs. Man United: 11 hrs 46 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

Analysis: England's performance in the Trevor Bayliss era

:Headline: Analysis: England's performance in the Trevor Bayliss era: ID:370853: from db_amp
England enjoyed World Cup glory in July but have failed to regain the Ashes.

England's once-in-a-generation summer will end on a damp squib after Australia ensured the Ashes would remain Down Under by moving into an unassailable 2-1 series lead at Old Trafford.

Conversely, England's fortunes in the limited-overs formats have never been better, having lifted the World Cup in July.

Here, the PA news agency looks at whether there is a correlation between whether being successful in one format comes at a detriment to another.

England in Tests from November 2010-June 2015

Series record (win/loss/draw): 8-4-4

Test-by-Test record: 23-17-14

Totals of 400-plus: 24 in 96 innings, a success rate of 25 per cent

Totals of less than 100 all out: one

Runs per wicket: 36.67

Runs per over: 3.21

This period began with England retaining the Ashes in Australia in the winter of 2010-11, with four innings where they topped 500 thanks largely to the inspirational form of opener Alastair Cook. The team's abject showing at the 2015 World Cup though prompted a change of emphasis.

England in Tests in the Trevor Bayliss era

Trevor Bayliss and England failed to win back the Ashes this summer (Mike Egerton/PA)

Series record (win/loss/draw): 8-5-3 (not including the ongoing series)

Test-by-Test record: 26-25-7 (including this series)

Totals of 400-plus: 16 in 110 innings, a success rate of 14.5 per cent

Totals of less than 100 all out: Four

Runs per wicket: 30.83

Runs per over: 3.25

England have failed to score 400 in any innings of the ongoing Ashes series. Only the heroics of Ben Stokes helped cover up an embarrassing 67 all out in the first innings at Headingley, and there were warning signs earlier in the summer when they only managed 85 first time out against Ireland at Lord's.

England in ODIs from November 2010-June 2015

England began a new era of ODI cricket with a glut of records against New Zealand in June 2015 (David Davies/PA)

Record (win/loss/tie/no result): 49-53-2-4

Totals of 350-plus: Three (all after the 2015 World Cup)

Average: 32.31

Runs per over: 5.38

The summer of 2015 marked a notable change in England's approach and results in one-day cricket after a miserable World Cup campaign earlier in the year.

England in ODIs in the Trevor Bayliss era

England savoured World Cup glory in July (Nick Potts/PA)

Record (win/loss/tie/no result): 62-24-2-5

Totals of 350-plus: 15

Average: 41.48

Runs per over: 6.21

The bolder approach to ODI cricket developed under Bayliss reached its goal with the dramatic victory over New Zealand in the World Cup final earlier this summer.

amp_article__370853 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-09-09 09:45:01:
html db last update - 2019-09-09 09:45:01 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Read more about Trevor Bayliss Cricket
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool15113131131836
2Chelsea16104237191834
3Arsenal1686229151430
4Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest168442119228
5Manchester CityMan City168352823527
6Bournemouth167452421325
7Aston Villa167452425-125
8Fulham166642422224
9Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton166642625124
10Tottenham HotspurSpurs1672736191723
11Brentford167273230223
12Newcastle UnitedNewcastle166552321223
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd166462119222
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham165472129-819
15Crystal Palace163761721-416
16Everton153661421-715
17Leicester CityLeicester163582134-1314
18Ipswich TownIpswich162681628-1212
19Wolverhampton WanderersWolves1623112440-169
20Southampton1612131136-255
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .