SM
England vs. Slovakia: 18 hrs 36 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup

:Headline: Result: Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup: ID:165942: from db_amp
Tom Daley misses out on a bronze medal after a slip-up in the fourth round at the diving World Cup.

A misfire in the fourth round has seen British diver Tom Daley miss out on a podium finish at the FINA World Cup in Shanghai.

The 20-year-old had been on course for bronze in the men's 10m platform final but a severe over-rotation on his most ambitious dive - the forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck - earned him a score of just 44.40, sending him plummeting down the leaderboard.

Solid performances in the remaining two rounds saw Daley climb his way back to a fourth-placed finish with a total of 470.35, but his earlier mistake allowed Mexican Ivan Garcia to capitalise and take the bronze.

As expected, Chinese powerhouses Yang Jian and Qiu Bo took the top two spots, posting totals of 543.85 and 528.50 for gold and silver respectively.

The result still leaves Daley, who picked up gold at the 2010 Commonwealths, as the top-ranked athlete heading into this year's Games.

Final rankings in full:
1. Yang Jian (CHN) - 543.85
2. Qiu Bo (CHN) - 528.50
3. Ivan Garcia (MEX) - 504.90
4. Tom Daley (GBR) - 470.35
5. Tze Liang Ooi (MAS) - 464.85
6. German Sanchez (MEX) - 462.50
7. Sascha Matthias Klein (GER) - 441.90
8. Francesco Dell'Uomo (ITA) - 437.50
9. Vadim Kaptur (BLR) - 429.25
10. Maksym Dolgov (UKR) - 426.05
11. Kazuki Murakami (JPN) - 395.05
12. Oleksandr Bondar (UKR) - 361.75

Tom Daley round-by-round:
Round 1: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 89.25
Round 2: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 84.60
Round 3: Inward 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.2) - 86.40
Round 4: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 44.40
Round 5: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 90.10

Qiu Bo round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 94.50
Round 2: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 96.25
Round 3: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 88.40
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 43.20
Round 5: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 105.45
Round 6: Forward 2-1/2 somersault 3 twist pike, (difficulty 3.8) - 100.70

Yang Jian round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 78.75
Round 2: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault, tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 96.90
Round 3: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 87.50
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 102.60
Round 5: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Forward 4-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 4.1) - 102.50

amp_article__165942 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2014-07-20 20:43:42:
html db last update - 2014-07-20 20:43:42 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
CManchester CityMan City38287396346291
2Arsenal38285591296289
3Liverpool382410486414582
4Aston Villa382081076611568
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs382061274611366
6Chelsea381891177631463
7Newcastle UnitedNewcastle381861485622360
8Manchester UnitedMan Utd38186145758-160
9West Ham UnitedWest Ham381410146074-1452
10Crystal Palace381310155758-149
11Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton381212145562-748
12Bournemouth38139165467-1348
13Fulham38138175561-647
14Wolverhampton WanderersWolves38137185065-1546
15Everton38139164051-1140
16Brentford38109195665-939
17Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest3899204967-1832
RLuton TownLuton3868245285-3326
RBurnley3859244178-3724
RSheffield UnitedSheff Utd38372835104-6916
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .