SM
Man City vs. Brighton: 9 hrs 47 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup

:Headline: Result: Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup: ID:165942: from db_amp
Tom Daley misses out on a bronze medal after a slip-up in the fourth round at the diving World Cup.

A misfire in the fourth round has seen British diver Tom Daley miss out on a podium finish at the FINA World Cup in Shanghai.

The 20-year-old had been on course for bronze in the men's 10m platform final but a severe over-rotation on his most ambitious dive - the forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck - earned him a score of just 44.40, sending him plummeting down the leaderboard.

Solid performances in the remaining two rounds saw Daley climb his way back to a fourth-placed finish with a total of 470.35, but his earlier mistake allowed Mexican Ivan Garcia to capitalise and take the bronze.

As expected, Chinese powerhouses Yang Jian and Qiu Bo took the top two spots, posting totals of 543.85 and 528.50 for gold and silver respectively.

The result still leaves Daley, who picked up gold at the 2010 Commonwealths, as the top-ranked athlete heading into this year's Games.

Final rankings in full:
1. Yang Jian (CHN) - 543.85
2. Qiu Bo (CHN) - 528.50
3. Ivan Garcia (MEX) - 504.90
4. Tom Daley (GBR) - 470.35
5. Tze Liang Ooi (MAS) - 464.85
6. German Sanchez (MEX) - 462.50
7. Sascha Matthias Klein (GER) - 441.90
8. Francesco Dell'Uomo (ITA) - 437.50
9. Vadim Kaptur (BLR) - 429.25
10. Maksym Dolgov (UKR) - 426.05
11. Kazuki Murakami (JPN) - 395.05
12. Oleksandr Bondar (UKR) - 361.75

Tom Daley round-by-round:
Round 1: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 89.25
Round 2: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 84.60
Round 3: Inward 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.2) - 86.40
Round 4: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 44.40
Round 5: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 90.10

Qiu Bo round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 94.50
Round 2: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 96.25
Round 3: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 88.40
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 43.20
Round 5: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 105.45
Round 6: Forward 2-1/2 somersault 3 twist pike, (difficulty 3.8) - 100.70

Yang Jian round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 78.75
Round 2: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault, tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 96.90
Round 3: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 87.50
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 102.60
Round 5: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Forward 4-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 4.1) - 102.50

amp_article__165942 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2014-07-20 20:43:42:
html db last update - 2014-07-20 20:43:42 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool29217169274270
2Arsenal281510352242855
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest28156745331251
4Chelsea28147753361749
5Manchester CityMan City28145953381547
6Newcastle UnitedNewcastle2814594738947
7Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton28121064640646
8Aston Villa2912984145-445
9Bournemouth28128847341344
10Fulham2811984138342
11Crystal Palace2810993633339
12Brentford28115124844438
13Tottenham HotspurSpurs281041455411434
14Manchester UnitedMan Utd2897123440-634
15Everton2871293135-433
16West Ham UnitedWest Ham2896133248-1633
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves2865173857-1923
18Ipswich TownIpswich2838172658-3217
19Leicester CityLeicester2845192562-3717
20Southampton2823232068-489
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .