SM
Man United vs. Arsenal: 5 hrs 51 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup

:Headline: Result: Tom Daley misses out on medal at diving World Cup: ID:165942: from db_amp
Tom Daley misses out on a bronze medal after a slip-up in the fourth round at the diving World Cup.

A misfire in the fourth round has seen British diver Tom Daley miss out on a podium finish at the FINA World Cup in Shanghai.

The 20-year-old had been on course for bronze in the men's 10m platform final but a severe over-rotation on his most ambitious dive - the forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck - earned him a score of just 44.40, sending him plummeting down the leaderboard.

Solid performances in the remaining two rounds saw Daley climb his way back to a fourth-placed finish with a total of 470.35, but his earlier mistake allowed Mexican Ivan Garcia to capitalise and take the bronze.

As expected, Chinese powerhouses Yang Jian and Qiu Bo took the top two spots, posting totals of 543.85 and 528.50 for gold and silver respectively.

The result still leaves Daley, who picked up gold at the 2010 Commonwealths, as the top-ranked athlete heading into this year's Games.

Final rankings in full:
1. Yang Jian (CHN) - 543.85
2. Qiu Bo (CHN) - 528.50
3. Ivan Garcia (MEX) - 504.90
4. Tom Daley (GBR) - 470.35
5. Tze Liang Ooi (MAS) - 464.85
6. German Sanchez (MEX) - 462.50
7. Sascha Matthias Klein (GER) - 441.90
8. Francesco Dell'Uomo (ITA) - 437.50
9. Vadim Kaptur (BLR) - 429.25
10. Maksym Dolgov (UKR) - 426.05
11. Kazuki Murakami (JPN) - 395.05
12. Oleksandr Bondar (UKR) - 361.75

Tom Daley round-by-round:
Round 1: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 89.25
Round 2: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 84.60
Round 3: Inward 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.2) - 86.40
Round 4: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 44.40
Round 5: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 90.10

Qiu Bo round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 94.50
Round 2: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 96.25
Round 3: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 88.40
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 43.20
Round 5: Forward 4-1/2 somersault tuck, (difficulty 3.7) - 105.45
Round 6: Forward 2-1/2 somersault 3 twist pike, (difficulty 3.8) - 100.70

Yang Jian round-by-round:
Round 1: Inward 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 78.75
Round 2: Reverse 3-1/2 somersault, tuck, (difficulty 3.4) - 96.90
Round 3: Armstand back 3 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.5) - 87.50
Round 4: Back 3-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 102.60
Round 5: Back 2-1/2 somersault 2-1/2 twist pike, (difficulty 3.6) - 75.60
Round 6: Forward 4-1/2 somersault pike, (difficulty 4.1) - 102.50

amp_article__165942 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2014-07-20 20:43:42:
html db last update - 2021-03-08 12:20:27 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html
Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Manchester CityMan City36267391335885
2Arsenal36265588286083
3Liverpool36239481384378
4Aston Villa36207973532067
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs361961171591263
6Newcastle UnitedNewcastle361761379572257
7Chelsea361691173611257
8Manchester UnitedMan Utd35166135255-354
9West Ham UnitedWest Ham371410135971-1252
10Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton361212125458-448
11Bournemouth37139155365-1248
12Crystal Palace371210155258-646
13Wolverhampton WanderersWolves37137175063-1346
14Fulham37128175159-844
15Everton37139153949-1040
16Brentford37109185461-739
17Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest3789204766-1929
18Luton TownLuton3768235081-3126
RBurnley3759234076-3624
RSheffield UnitedSheff Utd37372735101-6616
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .