SM
Real Sociedad vs. Real Madrid: 21 hrs 40 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

FA asked to investigate claims Fulham 'manipulated' Jean Michael Seri fee

:Headline: FA asked to investigate claims Fulham 'manipulated' Jean Michael Seri fee: ID:343283: from db_amp
Fulham have been accused of having an 'active role' in a ruse to undervalue the Ivorian midfielder to avoid paying sell-on fees to his former clubs.

The lawyer behind football's landmark Bosman ruling has written to the Football Association to demand an inquiry into Jean Michael Seri's transfer to Fulham from Nice.

The Ivorian midfielder joined the Premier League club with French left-back Maxime Le Marchand for a combined fee of £25million this summer.

According to French reports, the breakdown of that fee was approximately £15million for Le Marchand and £10million for Seri, despite the latter being better, younger and having longer on his contract.

Previously linked with Barcelona, Seri has already started legal proceedings in France against Nice, as he claims the club undervalued him in order to avoid paying a bonus. Le Marchand's value, on the other hand, was overstated.

Nice have denied this claim, but it has now emerged that Seri's former clubs in the Ivory Coast and Portugal believe they have been deprived of sell-on payments by the alleged manipulation of the combined fee.

Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, who revolutionised the transfer market in 1995 when he won a case for Jean-Marc Bosman, is representing the two clubs in the Ivory Coast, Centre Domoraud Cyrille and ASEC Mimosas.

He has written to the FA's chief investigations officer David Matthews on Monday to ask English football's governing body to investigate the allegations.

"In the proceedings that take place in France, Mr Seri has decided to direct his claim directly against OGC Nice," wrote Dupont.

"Centre Domoraud Cyrille and ASEC Mimosas believe however that this manipulation could not have taken place without a particularly active role of Fulham FC.

"As you know, pursuant to the relevant FIFA rules, it is Fulham FC that is the debtor of the solidarity fees towards the two African training clubs.

"Could you please let us know with due clarity if you are in a position to investigate these allegations and what could concretely be expected from your intervention?

"As you will understand, our clients are convinced that your intervention is not only absolutely necessary for them but also for the FA, if the FA is serious about complying with its ethical (and legal) commitments."

Fulham, who are bottom of the Premier League after just two wins in 14 games, have declined to comment, but it would appear they wanted the pair as they have both appeared regularly this season.

amp_article__343283 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2018-12-04 11:57:25:
html db last update - 2021-03-09 21:09:38 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html

Click here for more stories about Jean Michael Seri

Click here for more stories about Fulham

Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Arsenal34245582265677
2Manchester CityMan City33237380324876
3Liverpool34228475344174
4Aston Villa34206871502166
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs32186865491660
6Manchester UnitedMan Utd33165125150153
7Newcastle UnitedNewcastle331551369541550
8West Ham UnitedWest Ham34139125463-948
9Chelsea32138116157447
10Bournemouth34129134960-1145
11Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton331111115254-244
12Wolverhampton WanderersWolves34127154654-843
13Fulham34126165054-442
14Crystal Palace34109154456-1239
15Brentford3498175259-735
16Everton34118153648-1233
17Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest3479184260-1826
18Luton TownLuton3467214775-2825
19Burnley3458213769-3223
20Sheffield UnitedSheff Utd3437243392-5916
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .