SM
Bournemouth vs. West Ham: 23 hrs 22 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

No clubs willing to meet asking price of Liverpool defender Nat Phillips?

:Headline: No clubs willing to meet asking price of Liverpool defender Nat Phillips?:
Liverpool are reportedly struggling to attract any suitable offers for wantaway defender Nat Phillips.
Sports Mole

Liverpool are reportedly struggling to attract offers for Nat Phillips which meet their asking price.

Having barely played for the Merseyside giants this season, the centre-back will be allowed to depart Anfield should their £15m valuation be met before Monday's deadline.

Watford emerged as a potential destination earlier in the January transfer window, while Burnley and Newcastle United are also said to be admirers.

However, according to The Athletic, none of those clubs have been prepared to meet the figure demanded by Liverpool.

The 24-year-old's one and only start for Liverpool this season came away at AC Milan in the Champions League, but the Englishman impressed during a fixture where he also fractured his cheekbone.

Phillips is now on the brink of a return to action, leaving it plausible that several late approaches could be made on Monday.

body check tags ::

amp_article__476755 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2022-01-31 09:53:16:
html db last update - 2022-01-31 09:53:16 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Click here for more stories about Nat Phillips

Click here for more stories about Liverpool

Share this article now:
NU
Read Next:
Chelsea, Liverpool 'interested in Newcastle's Saint-Maximin'
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Nat Phillips Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Chelsea, Liverpool 'interested in Newcastle's Saint-Maximin'
Truly astonishing! Man City collapse again as late drama seals Man Utd victory
Highly-rated youngster's arrival 'could end' Zirkzee's Man United career
Manchester City planning Josko Gvardiol move?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool15113131131836
2Chelsea1594235181731
3Arsenal1686229151430
4Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest168442119228
5Manchester CityMan City168352823527
6Aston Villa167452425-125
7Bournemouth157352320324
8Fulham166642422224
9Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton166642625124
10Brentford157263128323
11Newcastle UnitedNewcastle166552321223
12Manchester UnitedMan Utd166462119222
13Tottenham HotspurSpurs1562731191220
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham155372028-818
15Crystal Palace163761721-416
16Everton153661421-715
17Leicester CityLeicester163582134-1314
18Ipswich TownIpswich162681628-1212
19Wolverhampton WanderersWolves1623112440-169
20Southampton1512121131-205
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Man City vs. Man Utd confirmed XIs: Foden decision made, Amorim makes four changes

1

MC

Rashford reaction: Marcus acknowledges Man United win after derby snub

NEW

2

RR

Preview: Real Madrid vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

3

PR

Mason's misery: Man United star suffers new injury in Manchester derby

4

MM

Changing of the guard? Chelsea identify successor to 'unimpressive' Sanchez

5

CO

Silence broken: Why were Rashford, Garnacho dropped for Manchester derby?

6

SB

Liverpool? Man Utd? Barca? Davies's 'most plausible' next club revealed

7

LM

Home comforts: Could Richarlison end Spurs struggles with January reunion?

8

HC

"We'll see" - Olympic medallist leaves door open to Liverpool transfer

9

&S

Wolves, Forest ready to target Premier League-proven defender?

10

WF


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .