SM
Liverpool vs. Fulham: 3 hrs 7 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

Peterborough United

More than 100 clubs join criticism of FA decision to void non-league season

:Headline: More than 100 clubs join criticism of FA decision to void non-league season: ID:394927: from db_amp
League One side Peterborough have expressed their solidarity for those clubs affected.

More than 100 clubs, including Peterborough, have now signed a letter to the Football Association to express "profound concern and displeasure" with the decision to expunge all results for the 2019-20 season at non-league and grassroots level.

The FA has faced criticism for voiding the season for non-league divisions below the National League and National League North and South, and for women's football below the Women's Super League and Championship, due to the coronavirus outbreak.

The governing body has said the decision was made by the leagues and supported by the FA Board and FA Women's Board, though it is yet to be ratified by the FA Council.

A letter sent to the FA on Monday carried an initial 64 signatories from across non-league football, but has attracted additional support since first being published, with South Shields saying on Tuesday morning the number had surpassed 100.

Peterborough owner Darragh MacAnthony also confirmed via social media that he has signed the letter on behalf of the Sky Bet League One club.

"Many thanks to @theposhofficial and their owner @DMAC102, who tonight agreed to sign the letter in a show of solidarity with those in the non-league pyramid," a tweet from South Shields said.

The letter accuses the FA of acting with "needless and inexplicable haste" in acting to void the season and said this was "coupled with (a) total lack of substantive dialogue or consultation with affected clubs".

The letter also claimed that clubs in steps one and two of the National League system – the National League and National League North and South – "were removed from the ruling at the 11th hour" and asked: "How can the FA possibly justify treating different steps under the non-league banner differently?"

Signatories to the letter said they agreed with the decision to halt play during the ongoing health crisis, but could not understand why results were voided in the lower leagues while the Premier League, EFL and others remain on hold with the hope of completing the season.

"Most clubs in steps three to six have now completed 70-80 per cent of their league fixtures, and it is incomprehensible that these results should be delegitimised and expunged on the basis that the final quarter of the season cannot be fulfilled in the future," the letter said.

"Our demand for the FA to reconsider its decision is also about sending a message to the fans of our clubs, who have spent hard-earned money to follow their teams up and down the country, letting them know their support was not in vain."

Jersey Bulls and Vauxhall Motors, two clubs who had already mathematically achieved promotion from their respective divisions this season, are among the signatories to the letter, but others said they were doing it to protect the integrity of competition.

They pointed to the FA's stated desire to complete the FA Trophy, despite the fact one semi-final will pit Southern Central Division One side Halesowen Town – whose season stands to be voided – against National League South side Concord Rangers – whose campaign remains valid.

The letter also rejected the FA's assertion in its own statement it "reached a consensus" with steps three to six of the National League System, saying many clubs were against the move while others were not properly consulted.

"A crisis like this is a watershed moment for the FA and the relationships it chooses to have with non-league and grassroots football," the letter said.

An FA spokesperson said: "The decision taken to end the 2019-20 season across steps three to seven of the National League system, the women's football pyramid and the wider grassroots game was made by committee representatives for the respective leagues, and was supported by the FA Board and the FA Women's Board.

"It will now go to the FA Council for ratification. We fully support the decision they came to during these challenging and unprecedented circumstances for English football."

amp_article__394927 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2020-03-31 09:56:37:
html db last update - 2020-03-31 09:56:37 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html

Coronavirus outbreak - Click here for more stories

Click here for more stories about Peterborough United

Share this article now:
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Wycombe WanderersWycombe18124239211840
2Wrexham19124328111740
3Birmingham CityBirmingham17123232161639
4Huddersfield TownHuddersfield18112528161235
5Stockport CountyStockport1996431191233
6Reading189453025531
7Bolton WanderersBolton179352827130
8Barnsley197662725227
9Lincoln CityLincoln197662423127
10Mansfield TownMansfield177372222024
11Exeter CityExeter187381619-324
12Charlton AthleticCharlton186571819-123
13Blackpool186572631-523
14Stevenage176471316-322
15Peterborough UnitedPeterborough186393332121
16Leyton Orient186391920-121
17Northampton TownNorthampton195682126-521
18Bristol Rovers186391726-921
19Wigan AthleticWigan185581516-120
20Rotherham UnitedRotherham175571620-420
21Crawley TownCrawley185491728-1119
22Cambridge UnitedCambridge1844101829-1116
23Burton Albion1825111630-1411
24Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury1832131835-1711
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .