SM
Sheff Utd vs. Hull City: 9 hrs 53 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Premier League clubs 'vote to close transfer loophole exploited by Chelsea'

:Headline: Premier League clubs 'vote to close transfer loophole exploited by Chelsea':
Chelsea are one of 15 Premier League clubs to vote in favour of closing the loophole they have exploited, in spreading transfer fees over the duration of long contracts.
Sports Mole

Premier League clubs have voted in favour of limiting the amortisation of new contacts to a maximum of five years.

The financial tactic has been seen as a loophole, exploited predominantly by Chelsea, in which they have been able to spend vast sums of money on players, but spreading the payment across a number of years.

Chelsea first optimised the loophole when signing Benoit Badiashile in January, and many of their signings since have been signed on contracts of up to eight years, including Enzo Fernandez, Mykhaylo Mudryk, Nicolas Jackson and Moises Caicedo.

As an example, Caicedo's transfer, which was worth £115m, will be spread across the eight years of the contract offered to him by Chelsea, meaning that the club will only technically pay £14.4m for him per year.

Since Todd Boehly's takeover, Chelsea have spent over £1bn on transfer fees in just two transfer windows, but the loophole has allowed them to avoid any Financial Fair Play or Profitability and Sustainability breaches.

One surprising fact from the vote that was put forward is that Chelsea were one of the 15 clubs who voted in favour of closing the loophole.

The Premier League put the topic forward in order to fall in line with UEFA, who themselves closed the loophole in June, and now the English top flight have followed suit.

Players will still be allowed to be signed on contracts of longer than five years, but clubs will no longer be able to spread the cost of the transfer over a period longer than that.

Among the five clubs who did not vote in favour, two voted against the block coming in, while a further three abstained.

A statement from the Premier League following the vote read: "Premier League Shareholders today agreed to amend the rule on amortisation of player registration costs to bring in line with UEFA's regulations. Going forward, a five-year maximum will apply to all new or extended player contracts."

One potential headache for Chelsea has been averted too, as the rule will not be backdated, meaning that any previous dealing will be allowed to happen as initially planned.

Had the ruling been backdated, then Chelsea would have almost certainly been in breach of FFP or SPR, but those worries have been eradicated.

Mauricio Pochettino called for more incomings to his Chelsea squad following their defeat at Everton on Sunday, but they will have to be wiser with their spending now, given the new ruling. body check tags ::

amp_article__531220 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2023-12-13 11:24:03:
html db last update - 2023-12-13 11:24:03 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Click here for more stories about Todd Boehly

Click here for more stories about Chelsea

Share this article now:
CM
Read Next:
Chelsea to consider offers for Gallagher in January?
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Todd Boehly Benoit Badiashile Enzo Fernandez Mykhaylo Mudryk Nicolas Jackson Moises Caicedo Mauricio Pochettino Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Chelsea to consider offers for Gallagher in January?
Garnacho and PSR: Will Man United star make shock switch to Chelsea?
"Hard to hide the frustration" - Man United head coach Amorim addresses shock claim
Chelsea's N'Golo Kante receives Saudi Arabia offer?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool21155150203050
2Arsenal22128243212244
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest22135433221144
4Chelsea22117444271740
5Manchester CityMan City22115644291538
6Newcastle UnitedNewcastle22115638261238
7Bournemouth22107536261037
8Aston Villa2210663334-136
9Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton2281043530534
10Fulham228953430433
11Brentford2284104039128
12Crystal Palace226972528-327
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd2275102732-526
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham2275102743-1626
15Tottenham HotspurSpurs22731245351024
16Everton214891828-1020
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves2244143251-1916
18Ipswich TownIpswich2237122043-2316
19Leicester CityLeicester2235142348-2514
20Southampton2213181550-356
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Preview: Man City vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

1

PM

Preview: Bournemouth vs. Nott'm Forest - prediction, team news, lineups

2

PB

Brown downplays McLaren's chances of '25 domination

NEW

3

BD

Preview: Udinese vs. Roma - prediction, team news, lineups

NEW

4

PU

Preview: Groningen vs. Heerenveen - prediction, team news, lineups

5

PG

Oh no! Amorim confirms double Man United injury blow after Rangers contest

6

ON

Preview: Dortmund vs. Werder Bremen - prediction, team news, lineups

7

PD

Preview: Freiburg vs. Bayern - prediction, team news, lineups

8

PF

Preview: Augsburg vs. Heidenheim - prediction, team news, lineups

9

PA

Preview: Liverpool vs. Ipswich - prediction, team news, lineups

10

PL


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .