SM
Valencia vs. Real Madrid: 21 hrs 13 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Manchester United's David de Gea 'refusing to take £9m-a-year pay cut'

:Headline: Manchester United's David de Gea 'refusing to take £9m-a-year pay cut':
Manchester United goalkeeper David de Gea is reportedly refusing to take a pay cut which would slash his yearly salary by £9m.
Sports Mole

Manchester United goalkeeper David de Gea is reportedly rejecting the Red Devils' attempts to slash his salary by as much as £9m a year with any new deal.

The 32-year-old continues to run down the final few months of his contract at Old Trafford and could depart as a free agent this summer as things stand.

De Gea has been tipped to head back to Spain for a couple of years now, and talk of an exit intensified when he briefly lost his spot in the team to Dean Henderson.

However, the Spain international has since returned to form in between the sticks, and while he has not been immune from criticism, his performances have been a big factor in Man United's treble hunt.

The Red Devils are now hoping to agree a new contract with De Gea, who is their highest earner on a whopping £375,000 a week under his current terms.

Man United are not willing to continue forking out such an extortionate salary to a player who will turn 33 in November, despite his desire to continue at the Theatre of Dreams.

According to The Sun, the 20-time English champions have proposed cutting De Gea's weekly wage down to £200,000, which would decrease his yearly earnings by £9m.

However, the shot-stopper has no intention of accepting such terms, which would see him fall behind Casemiro and Raphael Varane in the club's wage charts.

De Gea's camp are aware that he will need to accept a lower wage as Man United try to make cuts across the squad, but they do not want him to slip too far down the earnings board.

Nevertheless, all parties remain optimistic of striking a compromise in the coming weeks, which could see Man United make up for his decreased base pay with sizeable bonuses.

Man United activated 12-month contract extensions for all of Luke Shaw, Fred, Marcus Rashford and Diogo Dalot over the winter, and there is a similar option in De Gea's deal to keep him on the books until 2024.

That clause has not been triggered, though, as doing so would see the Spaniard remain on his current wage, and Man United are instead aiming to agree a fresh three years until the end of the 2025-26 season.

De Gea is now in his 12th season as a Man United player since joining from Atletico Madrid in 2011, and he has kept a record 185 clean sheets in 533 matches for the Red Devils.

The 32-year-old broke Peter Schmeichel's shutout record for the club against Newcastle United in February's EFL Cup final, winning his eighth trophy in Man United colours in the process.

De Gea's 13 Premier League clean sheets in the current campaign is also the joint-most alongside Nick Pope, and he could steer clear of the Newcastle man with a 14th in Sunday's clash with Nottingham Forest.

body check tags ::

amp_article__511511 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2023-04-16 18:46:32:
html db last update - 2023-04-16 18:46:32 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

David de Gea future - Click here for more stories

Click here for more stories about David de Gea

Click here for more stories about Manchester United

Share this article now:
MU
Read Next:
Man United 'want De Gea, Rashford deals signed by summer'
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about David de Gea Dean Henderson Raphael Varane Casemiro Luke Shaw Fred Marcus Rashford Diogo Dalot Nick Pope Peter Schmeichel Football Football Football Football Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Man United 'want De Gea, Rashford deals signed by summer'
Latest 'twist' in Rashford saga as Man United star 'rejects three huge offers'
Why is Havertz missing from Arsenal's clash with Brentford?
Manchester City planning Josko Gvardiol move?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool18143145172845
2Arsenal19116238172139
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest1911442619737
4Chelsea19105438231535
5Newcastle UnitedNewcastle1995532211132
6Manchester CityMan City199463226631
7Bournemouth198652923630
8Fulham197842825329
9Aston Villa198562831-329
10Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton196942928127
11Tottenham HotspurSpurs1973941281324
12Brentford197393335-224
13West Ham UnitedWest Ham196582335-1223
14Manchester UnitedMan Utd196492126-522
15Crystal Palace194872027-720
16Everton183871524-917
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves1944113142-1116
18Ipswich TownIpswich1936101833-1515
19Leicester CityLeicester1935112242-2014
20Southampton1913151239-276
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Nkunku, Felix, Madueke all to drop out? Chelsea predicted lineup vs. Crystal Palace

1

NF

Team News: Valencia vs. Real Madrid injury, suspension list, predicted XIs

2

TN

Preview: Watford vs. Sheff Utd - prediction, team news, lineups

NEW

3

PW

Preview: Benfica vs. Braga - prediction, team news, lineups

NEW

4

PB

One change from Southampton win? Crystal Palace predicted lineup vs. Chelsea

5

OC

Preview: Crystal Palace vs. Chelsea - prediction, team news, lineups

6

PC

Preview: Barbastro vs. Barcelona - prediction, team news, lineups

7

PB

Latest 'twist' in Rashford saga as Man United star 'rejects three huge offers'

8

L'

Szczesny debut? Araujo to start? How Barcelona could line up vs. Barbastro

9

SD

Preview: Fiorentina vs. Napoli - prediction, team news, lineups

10

PF


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .