SM
Club Brugge vs. Aston Villa: 18 hrs 6 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Premier League 'improperly influenced' in decision to block Newcastle takeover

:Headline: Premier League 'improperly influenced' in decision to block Newcastle takeover:
The league is a defendant in a competition law claim brought by St James Holdings Ltd.
Sports Mole

The Premier League was "improperly influenced" by other top-flight clubs and media group beIN in reaching a decision that effectively blocked the Saudi takeover of Newcastle, a tribunal has heard.

The "active lobbying" by the clubs and beIN, which owns the broadcast rights for the league in the Middle East and north Africa, "distorted the Premier League's fair and objective application of the rules" in relation to the proposed deal, it was argued.

The league is a defendant in a Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) claim brought by St James Holdings Ltd (SJHL), a company wholly owned by Newcastle owner Mike Ashley.

Newcastle owner Mike Ashley hoped to sell the club to a consortium featuring Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (Kirsty O'Connor/PA)

The basis of the claim is that the league, in deciding last summer that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would be a director exercising control over the club and therefore subject to its owners' and directors' test (OADT), did not apply its rules in a fair, objective and non-discriminatory manner, causing SJHL to suffer financial losses as a result when the takeover deal did not proceed.

Daniel Jowell, acting for SJHL, claimed the Premier League's decision on Saudi Arabia's director status had been reached after third parties influenced it.

"At the same time that the Premier League was reaching its decision (on the takeover), beIN was in the midst of negotiations for a new three-year broadcast rights deal," he said.

"(These were) going on behind closed doors and without competitive tender process. The (broadcast) deal was announced in December, after the takeover was effectively blocked by the Premier League decision.

"A number of major clubs that control or strongly influence the Premier League also joined in the lobbying against the deal.

"(Premier League chief executive) Mr Richard Masters held more than one direct meeting with beIN at this time.

Premier League chief executive Richard Masters (Mike Egerton/PA)

"We say this lobbying distorted the Premier League's fair and objective application of the rules. The result of all of this is that PIF (the Saudi Public Investment Fund) pulled out of the takeover."

Jowell said the claim of loss would centre on the difference between the agreed sale price and the current market price. He said the loss was "substantial" and that it currently "exceeds £10million" but could fluctuate as a result of other factors, such as if the club were relegated.

Wednesday's hearing concerned an application from the Premier League that the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Adam Lewis, acting for the league, set out the three reasons why it had made the application.

Lewis said SJHL was bound by Football Association rules which oblige participants involved in a football dispute to go through the arbitration process in the first instance. Jowell disputed that SJHL was bound in this way.

“A number of major clubs that control or strongly influence the Premier League also joined in the lobbying against the deal”
- Daniel Jowell

Lewis said the arbitration hearing connected to the dispute over the Newcastle takeover bid is set to start on January 3 next year and run for a little over a week.

He said the competition claim from SJHL was therefore an "abuse of process" and had at the very least been brought prematurely, and that nothing alleged in this claim was not already part of the arbitration.

He said the arbitration would make the CAT claim unnecessary if the club wins, and impossible to sustain if the club loses, and that it had been brought to "impose improper pressure" on the Premier League and offer Ashley "a second bite at the cherry".

He also said SJHL did not have standing to make a claim as this was a "hypothetical loss".

St James' Park (Laurence Griffiths/NMC Pool/PA)

"There is nothing to show that the transaction will not go ahead if KSA is not assessed against the OADT (owners' and directors' test)," Lewis said.

"Nor is there evidence the price will be any different. Far from having suffered any loss at the moment, SJHL still owns the club and still has the prospect of completing the deal. It does not have standing to bring this claim. It has to show loss has occurred. They have shot their bolt too quickly."

Jowell said there was "no basis" for assuming PIF would definitely still be interested in a takeover when the arbitration concludes next year, still less that it would go ahead on the same terms as previously agreed.

"Even if PIF were prepared to go ahead on the same terms, St James would still have a claim for being kept out of its money for three years," Jowell said.

The Honourable Mr Justice Miles said the tribunal would "go away and consider with care" the evidence put before it.

body check tags ::

amp_article__465983 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2021-09-29 16:53:16:
html db last update - 2021-09-29 16:53:16 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Click here for more stories about Newcastle United

Share this article now:
NU
Read Next:
Bruce praises "terrific" Newcastle performance
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Newcastle United Saudi Arabia Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Bruce praises "terrific" Newcastle performance
Hat-trick hero: Gyokeres nets three and Amorim excels as Sporting stun Man City

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool108111961325
2Manchester CityMan City1072121111023
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest10541147719
4Chelsea105322012818
5Arsenal105321711618
6Aston Villa105321715218
7Tottenham HotspurSpurs1051422111116
8Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton104421714316
9Fulham104331413115
10Bournemouth104331312115
11Newcastle UnitedNewcastle104331010015
12Brentford104151920-113
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd10334912-312
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham103251319-611
15Leicester CityLeicester102441418-410
16Everton102351017-79
17Crystal Palace10145813-57
18Ipswich TownIpswich100551021-115
19Southampton10118719-124
20Wolverhampton WanderersWolves100371427-133
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

UEFA Champions League all-time top scorers

NEW

1

UC

Champions League 2024-25: How many points do teams need to qualify for knockouts?

2

CL

Preview: Ajax vs. M. Tel Aviv - prediction, team news, lineups

NEW

3

PA

Preview: Chelsea vs. Noah - prediction, team news, lineups

4

PC

Bernabeu breached: Real Madrid fall to another home defeat against AC Milan

NEW

5

BB

Sancho among 11 changes? Chelsea predicted lineup vs. FC Noah

6

SA

Zirkzee or Hojlund? Predicted Man United lineup vs. PAOK

7

ZO

Preview: Man Utd vs. PAOK - prediction, team news, lineups

8

PM

Rashford upgrade? Man United identify £76m winger as 'priority' signing

9

RU

Team News: Inter Milan vs. Arsenal injury, suspension list, predicted XIs

10

TN


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .