SM
Chelsea vs. West Ham: 1 day 2 hrs 2 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league

:Headline: EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league: ID:382695: from db_amp
The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees.

Rick Parry fears Bury may not be the last EFL club to lose their membership over financial difficulties.

The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees to the EFL, with a late takeover bid also collapsing.

League Two club Macclesfield are in a perilous state, having been charged in November with misconduct by the EFL over failing to pay players' wages. The Silkmen also face further disciplinary action after the club failed to fulfil their fixture against Crewe last weekend.

Parry admits it is unlikely Bury will be an isolated case.

"I definitely can't say (Bury) will be the last, there may be more fall-out to come," he said.

"We have seen the problems with Macclesfield which are fairly extreme and they are not the only one. Maybe we are going to have to go through more pain before it gets better."

Parry did not feel the issue was that there were too many clubs in the EFL structure.

"I don't think we have got too many clubs, there are many full-time clubs thriving below the EFL," he said.

"There are a few bad owners and maybe there are still a few to weed out."

The problems faced by Bury will be addressed as part of an independent review of EFL governance by Jonathan Taylor QC, a barrister specialising in sports law.

Bury's league membership was withdrawn in August (Peter Byrne/PA)

One solution may be the introduction of clearer, tighter salary cap rules.

Parry admits the decision in rugby union to dock Saracens 35 points for salary cap breaches suggests such sanctions are legally enforceable and that it is an area which could be explored.

"The Saracens decision says it must be lawful because it is something they have enforced," he said.

"We always felt it was something that couldn't be explored. I've heard clubs recently say maybe what we have is too complex and maybe we should concentrate on the issue we are all concerned about which is wage costs and focus on something similar.

"But to say that's the majority view or something that is likely to happen is way off the mark. It's part of the debate.

"We do have quite different rules in Championship compared with salary cost management protocols lower down. That works, but some clubs think we should have more of an alignment and one set of rules."

amp_article__382695 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-12-13 00:25:39:
html db last update - 2019-12-13 00:25:39 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html

Click here for more stories about Rick Parry

Click here for more stories about Macclesfield Town

Share this article now:
Read more about Rick Parry Off The Pitch
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Walsall28185554302459
2Doncaster RoversDoncaster29157742321052
3Notts County28148645281750
4AFC Wimbledon27146739201948
5Crewe AlexandraCrewe291212536251148
6Port Vale2813963529648
7Bradford CityBradford28138738281047
8Salford City2812883326744
9Grimsby Town29133134045-542
10Chesterfield28109943321139
11MK Dons28115124240238
12Cheltenham TownCheltenham28108103739-238
13Colchester UnitedColchester2881373329437
14Swindon TownSwindon30910114344-137
15Fleetwood TownFleetwood279993735236
16Bromley2881193637-135
17Gillingham2795132529-432
18BarrowBarrow2887132732-531
19Newport CountyNewport2786133546-1130
20Harrogate TownHarrogate3086162541-1630
21Accrington StanleyAccrington2778123445-1129
22Tranmere RoversTranmere2868142146-2526
23Morecambe2865172644-1823
24Carlisle UnitedCarlisle2856172246-2421
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .