SM
Brighton vs. Man City: 9 hrs 27 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews

EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league

:Headline: EFL chief concerned more clubs could drop out of league: ID:382695: from db_amp
The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees.

Rick Parry fears Bury may not be the last EFL club to lose their membership over financial difficulties.

The Shakers were expelled from the league in August after failing to provide financial guarantees to the EFL, with a late takeover bid also collapsing.

League Two club Macclesfield are in a perilous state, having been charged in November with misconduct by the EFL over failing to pay players' wages. The Silkmen also face further disciplinary action after the club failed to fulfil their fixture against Crewe last weekend.

Parry admits it is unlikely Bury will be an isolated case.

"I definitely can't say (Bury) will be the last, there may be more fall-out to come," he said.

"We have seen the problems with Macclesfield which are fairly extreme and they are not the only one. Maybe we are going to have to go through more pain before it gets better."

Parry did not feel the issue was that there were too many clubs in the EFL structure.

"I don't think we have got too many clubs, there are many full-time clubs thriving below the EFL," he said.

"There are a few bad owners and maybe there are still a few to weed out."

The problems faced by Bury will be addressed as part of an independent review of EFL governance by Jonathan Taylor QC, a barrister specialising in sports law.

Bury's league membership was withdrawn in August (Peter Byrne/PA)

One solution may be the introduction of clearer, tighter salary cap rules.

Parry admits the decision in rugby union to dock Saracens 35 points for salary cap breaches suggests such sanctions are legally enforceable and that it is an area which could be explored.

"The Saracens decision says it must be lawful because it is something they have enforced," he said.

"We always felt it was something that couldn't be explored. I've heard clubs recently say maybe what we have is too complex and maybe we should concentrate on the issue we are all concerned about which is wage costs and focus on something similar.

"But to say that's the majority view or something that is likely to happen is way off the mark. It's part of the debate.

"We do have quite different rules in Championship compared with salary cost management protocols lower down. That works, but some clubs think we should have more of an alignment and one set of rules."

amp_article__382695 : Database Data restored...  : 
last updated article - 2019-12-13 00:25:39:
html db last update - 2021-03-05 14:16:16 :

ex - 7200 : read : read cache amp html

Click here for more stories about Rick Parry

Click here for more stories about Macclesfield Town

Share this article now:
Read more about Rick Parry Off The Pitch
Recommended Next on SM
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
CStockport CountyStockport452711795464992
4MK Dons452381479641577
5Doncaster RoversDoncaster45217177166570
6Crewe AlexandraCrewe451913136864470
7BarrowBarrow451814136155668
8Crawley TownCrawley45207187167467
9Bradford CityBradford451812155758-166
10Walsall451811166868065
11Gillingham45189184455-1163
12AFC Wimbledon451614155950962
13Harrogate TownHarrogate451711175867-962
14Notts County45187208985461
15Tranmere RoversTranmere45176226666057
16Morecambe45179196478-1457
17Newport CountyNewport45167226172-1155
18Accrington StanleyAccrington45159215970-1154
19Swindon TownSwindon451411207480-653
20Salford City451311216480-1650
21Grimsby Town451116185772-1549
22Colchester UnitedColchester451111235879-2144
23Sutton UnitedSutton45914225580-2541
RForest Green RoversForest Green45109264378-3539
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .