SM
Sunday, June 23
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Sir Jim Ratcliffe could be forced to sell Manchester United shares in 18 months

:Headline: Sir Jim Ratcliffe could be forced to sell Manchester United shares in 18 months:
A document reveals that Sir Jim Ratcliffe would be forced to sell off his Manchester United shares in 18 months if the Glazer family decide to pursue another avenue.
Sports Mole

Sir Jim Ratcliffe would be forced to sell off his Manchester United shares in 18 months if the Glazer family decide to pursue another avenue, according to a document.

On Christmas Eve, it was confirmed that Ratcliffe, via his INEOS Group, had reached an agreement to purchase 25% of the club, and the deal is set to be ratified by the Premier League within the next four weeks.

Ratcliffe was present in the stands for Man United's Premier League clash with Tottenham Hotspur last Sunday, and the British billionaire is set to take over the football department at Old Trafford.

However, according to documents that were submitted by Man United to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Ratcliffe is at risk of being forced to sell his shares in 18 months.

The Glazer family are not allowed to encourage new offers for the 20-time English champions for the first year without written consent of Ratcliffe's Trawler Ltd company.

However, once 18 months have passed, the Americans would be able to sell Man United to another party, with Ratcliffe being forced to sell every share he owns.

"For so long as the Glazer parties are the majority holder, following the date that is 18 months after the closing date and in connection with any sale of the entire company, the Company Board may require the Trawlers party to sell all of their company ordinary shares and take such other actions as are reasonably necessary to effect the full sale," read the tender document.

"If the sale occurs within three years of the closing of the offer, the Trawlers parties must receive at least $33 per share, which is the same price as the offer price."

A much higher offer would therefore place Ratcliffe, who has paid in the region of £1.3bn for 25% of the club, in a difficult position.

The documents which were submitted by Man United to SEC have also claimed that Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani was unable to provide proof of funds.

However, the team behind Qatar's offer for the 20-time English champions have allegedly insisted that is not the case.

The Qataris could reportedly ask for a fresh statement from the SEC, but Man United remain confident that the information they provided was correct.

Sheikh Jassim's final offer for Man United is said to have been around £4bn, but it is alleged that figure is inaccurate, with his team claiming that the asking price for the club was met.

Ratcliffe is believed to have big plans for the summer transfer window, with the owner and founder of INEOS said to be looking to bring in an elite forward as part of another rebuild. body check tags ::

amp_article__534367 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2024-01-21 21:08:53:
html db last update - 2024-01-21 21:08:53 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Manchester United takeover - Click here for more stories

Click here for more stories about Jim Ratcliffe

Click here for more stories about Manchester United

Share this article now:
GV
Read Next:
Qataris 'refute claims they did not prove funds for Man United takeover'
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Jim Ratcliffe Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Qataris 'refute claims they did not prove funds for Man United takeover'
Belgium defeat Romania to keep Euro 2024 hopes alive
VAR takes centre stage as Mbappe-less France held by the Netherlands
Manchester City planning Josko Gvardiol move?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
CManchester CityMan City38287396346291
2Arsenal38285591296289
3Liverpool382410486414582
4Aston Villa382081076611568
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs382061274611366
6Chelsea381891177631463
7Newcastle UnitedNewcastle381861485622360
8Manchester UnitedMan Utd38186145758-160
9West Ham UnitedWest Ham381410146074-1452
10Crystal Palace381310155758-149
11Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton381212145562-748
12Bournemouth38139165467-1348
13Fulham38138175561-647
14Wolverhampton WanderersWolves38137185065-1546
15Everton38139164051-1140
16Brentford38109195665-939
17Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest3899204967-1832
RLuton TownLuton3868245285-3326
RBurnley3859244178-3724
RSheffield UnitedSheff Utd38372835104-6916
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Preview: Belgium vs. Romania - prediction, team news, lineups

1

PB

What next? Simons 'decides' PSG future

2

WN

Charlie Lawson discusses potential Coronation Street return

NEW

3

CL

Fulham 'considering' move for Serie A forward

4

F'

Preview: Turkey vs. Portugal - prediction, team news, lineups

5

PT

Striker solution? Chelsea 'hold' talks with David

6

SS

Preview: Georgia vs. Czech Republic - prediction, team news, lineups

7

PG

Lukaku could hold the key as Chelsea make 'slow progress' in £113m deal

8

LC

Second try: Chelsea 'planning' revised bid for youthful striker

9

ST

Saturday's Euro 2024 predictions including Turkey vs. Portugal

10

SE


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .