SM
Spurs vs. Liverpool: 8 hrs 28 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Manchester United 'put £50m asking price on Anthony Martial'

:Headline: Manchester United 'put £50m asking price on Anthony Martial':
Manchester United will reportedly demand in the region of £50m if any club expresses an interest in Anthony Martial.
Sports Mole

Manchester United will reportedly expect to receive £50m if they agree to part ways with Anthony Martial this summer.

On the back of scoring just seven goals in all competitions last season, Martial finds himself further down the pecking order at Old Trafford due to the arrival of Jadon Sancho.

The likes of Tottenham Hotspur and Inter Milan have been linked with an approach for the Frenchman, who could be allowed to leave United over the coming weeks.

However, according to The Sun, the Premier League giants intend to demand £50m if they are to agree to his departure.

The report suggests that a season-long loan arrangement remains a possibility, providing that any interested club is prepared to complete a permanent deal in 2022.

Martial effectively has four years left on his contract, leaving United in a strong position when it comes to negotiating his future.

body check tags ::

amp_article__458716 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2021-08-09 10:58:50:
html db last update - 2021-08-09 10:58:50 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Click here for more stories about Anthony Martial

Click here for more stories about Manchester United

Share this article now:
MU
Read Next:
Solskjaer provides Martial update amid transfer links
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Anthony Martial Jadon Sancho Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
Solskjaer provides Martial update amid transfer links
"The gamble has backfired" - Do Arsenal have themselves to blame for Newcastle loss?
Villa name Duran asking price amid Barcelona, PSG interest?
Manchester City planning Josko Gvardiol move?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool19144147192846
2Arsenal20117239182140
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest20124429191040
4Chelsea20106439241536
5Newcastle UnitedNewcastle20105534221235
6Manchester CityMan City2010463627934
7Bournemouth209653023733
8Aston Villa209563032-232
9Fulham207943027330
10Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton2061043029128
11Brentford208393835327
12Tottenham HotspurSpurs20731042301224
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd206592328-523
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham206592439-1523
15Crystal Palace204972128-721
16Everton193881525-1017
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves2044123145-1416
18Ipswich TownIpswich2037102035-1516
19Leicester CityLeicester2035122344-2114
20Southampton2013161244-326
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

'Back to his best': Should Slot start Bradley or Alexander-Arnold against Spurs?

1

'T

Wednesday's Transfer Talk Update: Antony, Casemiro, Marmoush

2

WT

Man United identify cheaper left-back alternative to Mendes, Kerkez?

3

MU

How close are Man City to signing £50m Marmoush?

4

HC

Why will Man United 'reluctantly consider' selling Mainoo, Garnacho?

5

WW

Isak shows Arsenal what they are missing as Newcastle close in on ending 70-year drought

6

IS

Revealed! Two reasons why Wolves star Cunha only received two-match ban

7

RT

Preview: Real Madrid vs. Mallorca - prediction, team news, lineups

8

PR

Could Casemiro ditch Man United for Ronaldo reunion this month?

9

CC

'Rivalry and needle' - Is a red card inevitable in Arsenal vs. Newcastle?

10

'A


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .