SM
Yemen vs. Saudi Arabia: 20 hrs 1 min
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data

Manchester City 'still £50m short for Tottenham Hotspur striker Harry Kane'

:Headline: Manchester City 'still £50m short for Tottenham Hotspur striker Harry Kane':
Manchester City are still £50m short of meeting Tottenham Hotspur's valuation of Harry Kane, with Daniel Levy valuing the striker at £150m, according to a report.
Sports Mole

Tottenham Hotspur have told Manchester City to increase their offer for Harry Kane by £50m, according to a report.

The Premier League champions have been in pursuit of the England captain throughout the summer, and made an opening bid of £100m.

Pep Guardiola has already spent the same figure on Jack Grealish, but he will seemingly have to pay even more if he wishes to bring Kane to Manchester.

The Mirror claim that Man City are yet to improve on their initial offer, but could be willing to pay £120m.

However, the report states that Daniel Levy will only consider offers of around £150m, and will not accept any deals that include Man City players as makeweights.

After not being included in Tottenham's squad for their opening day win over the champions, Kane was named on the bench for this afternoon's Premier League fixture against Wolverhampton Wanderers.

body check tags ::

amp_article__460412 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2021-08-22 14:36:32:
html db last update - 2021-08-22 14:36:32 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Harry Kane future - Click here for more stories

Click here for more stories about Harry Kane

Click here for more stories about Tottenham Hotspur

Share this article now:
MC
Read Next:
AC Milan target £45m Bernardo Silva swoop?
>


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Read more about Harry Kane Pep Guardiola Jack Grealish Daniel Levy Football
Follow @SportsMole for the latest breaking news stories, and follow @sm_headlines to get every headline from Sports Mole
Recommended Next on SM
AC Milan target £45m Bernardo Silva swoop?
"Could have used him less" - Is Arteta to blame for Saka's serious injury?

Page options

Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool16123137162139
2Chelsea17105237191835
3Arsenal1796234161833
4Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest179442319431
5Bournemouth178452721628
6Aston Villa178452626028
7Manchester CityMan City178362925427
8Newcastle UnitedNewcastle177552721626
9Fulham176742422225
10Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton176742726125
11Tottenham HotspurSpurs1772839251423
12Brentford177283232023
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd176472122-122
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham175572230-820
15Everton163761421-716
16Crystal Palace173771826-816
17Leicester CityLeicester173592137-1614
18Wolverhampton WanderersWolves1733112740-1312
19Ipswich TownIpswich172691632-1612
20Southampton1713131136-256
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Preview: Man City vs. Everton - prediction, team news, lineups

1

PM

Preview: Bristol City vs. Luton - prediction, team news, lineups

2

PB

Will Ait-Nouri return after suspension? Wolves predicted lineup vs. Man United

NEW

3

WA

Rashford banished again? Is De Ligt fit? Man United predicted lineup vs. Wolves

NEW

4

RB

"Could have used him less" - Is Arteta to blame for Saka's serious injury?

5

&H

Will De Bruyne, Walker return after being dropped? Man City predicted XI vs. Everton

6

WD

Preview: Oxford Utd vs. Cardiff - prediction, team news, lineups

7

PO

Hansi Flick 'gives green light' for sensational Rashford swap deal

8

HF

Juventus 'make first request' to sign Chelsea defender

9

J'

Bukayo Saka injury 'timeline' emerges as Arsenal 'fear' revealed

10

BS


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .