SM
Arsenal vs. Newcastle: 4 hrs 59 mins
Upcoming predictions and previews
Collect News Data
BL
Premier League | Gameweek 28
Mar 5, 2022 at 3pm UK
Turf Moor
CL

Burnley
0 - 4
Chelsea


Barnes (84'), Westwood (89')
FT(HT: 0-0)
James (47'), Havertz (52', 55'), Pulisic (69')

James Tarkowski says Burnley are 'better than that' following Chelsea defeat

:Headline: James Tarkowski says Burnley are 'better than that' following Chelsea defeat:
Burnley defender James Tarkowski has claimed that the team are better than the performance that they gave against Chelsea on Saturday.
Sports Mole

Burnley defender James Tarkowski believes they are better than what was displayed against Chelsea.

The Clarets were defeated 4-0 against Thomas Tuchel's team following second-half goals from Reece James, Kai Havertz and Christian Pulisic wrapping up the fixture.

This was the second defeat in a row for Burnley, following a loss against Leicester City in midweek, which has left the club 18th placed in the Premier League table.

"We are better than that and we know we are. If we could have kept up that first-half performance, we were right in the game and we missed a couple of big chances too," Tarkowski told the press.

"We have been better than that recently. First half we were really good and it is just a shame that in that 10 minutes it was over."

Burnley will be back in action on Saturday against Brentford in the Premier League.

body check tags ::

amp_article__479987 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2022-03-07 04:50:53:
html db last update - 2022-03-07 04:50:53 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html
Read more!

Click here for more stories about James Tarkowski

Click here for more stories about Chelsea

Share this article now:


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!
Recommended Next on SM
Tuchel proud of Chelsea's "character" over past week
Summer signing? Four Premier League clubs 'approach' Lille star Jonathan David
"I'm pretty upset" - Fernandes sends clear message after Anfield draw
Chelsea's N'Golo Kante receives Saudi Arabia offer?
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool19144147192846
2Arsenal20117239182140
3Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest20124429191040
4Chelsea20106439241536
5Newcastle UnitedNewcastle20105534221235
6Manchester CityMan City2010463627934
7Bournemouth209653023733
8Aston Villa209563032-232
9Fulham207943027330
10Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton2061043029128
11Brentford208393835327
12Tottenham HotspurSpurs20731042301224
13Manchester UnitedMan Utd206592328-523
14West Ham UnitedWest Ham206592439-1523
15Crystal Palace204972128-721
16Everton193881525-1017
17Wolverhampton WanderersWolves2044123145-1416
18Ipswich TownIpswich2037102035-1516
19Leicester CityLeicester2035122344-2114
20Southampton2013161244-326
Scroll for more - Tap for full version


Sports Mole provides in-depth previews and predictions for every match from the biggest leagues and competitions in world football.
AL
Sign up for our FREE daily preview newsletter direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

history www

Chelsea's 'silly' offer for £55m-rated star set to be rejected?

1

C'

Could Casemiro ditch Man United for Ronaldo reunion this month?

NEW

2

CC

Major update: Gyokeres 'targeting move to bigger club' amid Man United links

NEW

3

MU

Preview: Everton vs. Peterborough - prediction, team news, lineups

NEW

4

PE

'Rivalry and needle' - Is a red card inevitable in Arsenal vs. Newcastle?

NEW

5

'A

Man United attacker 'offered surprise escape route' after 'rigorous' search

6

MU

"His quality is undeniable": Is Man City-linked Marmoush ready for next step?

7

&Q

Help for Haaland: Man City open 'preliminary talks' for 18-goal striker

8

HF

Preview: Cleveland Cavaliers vs. Oklahoma City Thunder - prediction, team news, form guide

9

PC

Liverpool to replace Salah with £2.9m star who haunted Man City?

10

LT


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .