Current League Standings | P | GD | PTS | |
2 | Liverpool | 38 | 68 | 92 |
3 | Chelsea | 38 | 43 | 74 |
4 | Tottenham Hotspur | 38 | 29 | 71 |
Current League Standings | P | GD | PTS | |
7 | West Ham United | 38 | 9 | 56 |
8 | Leicester City | 38 | 3 | 52 |
9 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 38 | -2 | 51 |
Our analysis of all available data, including recent performances and player stats up until an hour before kickoff, suggested the most likely outcome of this match was a Chelsea win with a probability of 60.15%. A draw had a probability of 20.9% and a win for Leicester City had a probability of 18.98%.
The most likely scoreline for a Chelsea win was 2-1 with a probability of 9.93%. The next most likely scorelines for that outcome were 2-0 (9.33%) and 1-0 (9.1%). The likeliest drawn scoreline was 1-1 (9.68%), while for a Leicester City win it was 1-2 (5.15%). The actual scoreline of 1-1 was predicted with a 9.7% likelihood.
Result | ||
Chelsea | Draw | Leicester City |
60.15% ( -3.25) | 20.87% ( 1.37) | 18.98% ( 1.89) |
Both teams to score 57.08% ( -1.12) |
Goals |
Over 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
60.22% ( -3.22) | 39.77% ( 3.22) |
Over 3.5 | Under 3.5 |
37.87% ( -3.42) | 62.13% ( 3.42) |
Chelsea Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
87.15% ( -1.87) | 12.85% ( 1.87) |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
60.78% ( -3.98) | 39.22% ( 3.98) |
Leicester City Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
65.49% ( 0.12) | 34.51% ( -0.12) |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
28.78% ( 0.13) | 71.22% ( -0.13) |
Score Analysis |
Chelsea | Draw | Leicester City |
2-1 @ 9.93% ( 0.09) 2-0 @ 9.33% ( 0.06) 1-0 @ 9.1% ( 0.7) 3-1 @ 6.79% ( -0.45) 3-0 @ 6.38% ( -0.45) 3-2 @ 3.61% ( -0.23) 4-1 @ 3.48% ( -0.52) 4-0 @ 3.27% ( -0.5) 4-2 @ 1.85% ( -0.27) 5-1 @ 1.43% ( -0.34) 5-0 @ 1.34% ( -0.32) Other @ 3.61% Total : 60.15% | 1-1 @ 9.68% ( 0.77) 2-2 @ 5.28% ( 0.07) 0-0 @ 4.43% ( 0.63) 3-3 @ 1.28% ( -0.08) Other @ 0.19% Total : 20.87% | 1-2 @ 5.15% ( 0.43) 0-1 @ 4.72% ( 0.69) 0-2 @ 2.51% ( 0.37) 2-3 @ 1.87% ( 0.03) 1-3 @ 1.83% ( 0.16) Other @ 2.9% Total : 18.98% |
ISOCountry Code:
Matched Country Groups: