Current League Standings | P | GD | PTS | |
3 | River Plate | 13 | 18 | 26 |
4 | Boca Juniors | 13 | 6 | 24 |
5 | Defensa y Justicia | 12 | 7 | 22 |
Current League Standings | P | GD | PTS | |
8 | Newell's Old Boys | 12 | 3 | 20 |
9 | Tigre | 12 | 7 | 19 |
10 | Argentinos Juniors | 12 | 3 | 19 |
Our analysis of all available data, including recent performances and player stats up until an hour before kickoff, suggested the most likely outcome of this match was a Boca Juniors win with a probability of 59.9%. A draw had a probability of 23.8% and a win for Tigre had a probability of 16.32%.
The most likely scoreline for a Boca Juniors win was 1-0 with a probability of 14.7%. The next most likely scorelines for that outcome were 2-0 (12.44%) and 2-1 (9.34%). The likeliest drawn scoreline was 1-1 (11.04%), while for a Tigre win it was 0-1 (6.53%). The actual scoreline of 5-3 was predicted with a 0.1% likelihood. Our team at Sports Mole and our data analysis both correctly predicted that Boca Juniors would win this match.
Result | ||
Boca Juniors | Draw | Tigre |
59.9% ( -0.7) | 23.78% ( -0.1) | 16.32% ( 0.79) |
Both teams to score 43.08% ( 1.78) |
Goals |
Over 2.5 | Under 2.5 |
44.14% ( 1.51) | 55.85% ( -1.51) |
Over 3.5 | Under 3.5 |
23.03% ( 1.21) | 76.97% ( -1.22) |
Boca Juniors Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
81.58% ( 0.31) | 18.41% ( -0.31) |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
50.42% ( 0.52) | 49.57% ( -0.52) |
Tigre Goals |
Over 0.5 | Under 0.5 |
52.8% ( 1.99) | 47.19% ( -2) |
Over 1.5 | Under 1.5 |
17.37% ( 1.45) | 82.63% ( -1.46) |
Score Analysis |
Boca Juniors | Draw | Tigre |
1-0 @ 14.7% ( -0.73) 2-0 @ 12.44% ( -0.48) 2-1 @ 9.34% ( 0.17) 3-0 @ 7.02% ( -0.2) 3-1 @ 5.27% ( 0.15) 4-0 @ 2.97% ( -0.06) 4-1 @ 2.23% ( 0.08) 3-2 @ 1.98% ( 0.16) 5-0 @ 1% ( -0.01) Other @ 2.95% Total : 59.89% | 1-1 @ 11.04% ( 0.1) 0-0 @ 8.69% ( -0.52) 2-2 @ 3.51% ( 0.25) Other @ 0.54% Total : 23.77% | 0-1 @ 6.53% ( -0.01) 1-2 @ 4.15% ( 0.26) 0-2 @ 2.45% ( 0.13) 1-3 @ 1.04% ( 0.12) Other @ 2.16% Total : 16.32% |
ISOCountry Code:
Matched Country Groups: